这姓贺的喜欢玩弄中国人的小聪明，自以为能言善辩，头脑聪明，又会利用
互联网煽动华人族群情绪，以为声势浩大，计谋得逞。他忘了，美国是个法
制社会，再有理，再亲情，也得到法庭上去靠证据事实说服陪审团和法官，
而当事人和证人的可信度，诚实性，更是影响案件判决的关键。贺绍强恰恰
在这一点上弄巧成拙，谎言连篇，害人害己。
从法官披露的材料看，姓贺的至少在如下两件事情上作假：
- 在法庭作证时对自己的收入作假。试图以收入低作为当初将贺梅送人抚养
的理由，结果被法庭发现说假话；
- 1997年在门非斯大学当学生时，把一个不是他妻子的女人说成是他妻子，
试图作假骗得F2签证把她弄进美国。
这两条加上其他事实，足以毁灭贺的诚实性，可信性，他的种种理由就实在
难以令人相信。在美国，一个人被法庭判定为“deceitfulness and dishonesty，
lied under oath，perjury” ，这人也就完了，花再多钱官司也输定了。
美国制度一开始是相信每个人的，一开始是给你credit的，相信每个人都是
诚实，自尊，可信的。但若你作假，欺骗，一旦被抓住，你就lose credit，
你就再不会被人相信，贺绍强就是一个最好的例子。中国人常常觉得老美太
单纯好骗，沾沾自喜，连办绿卡大多数文件都只需复印件，而不要原件。
但弄虚作假在美国是玩火，被抓住一次你就玩完，一点小聪明的代价可能叫
你后悔终生。
贺绍强如果一开始与法庭配合，老老实实陈述事实，鉴于亲情关系，这官司
未必会输。结果是一错再错，谎话连篇，误人误己，现在没人能相信他了。
美国法官公开的材料：
Mr. He is highly educated, both in the Peoples Republic of China and
in the United States, and exhibits a high level of intelligence. He has
demonstrated that he also has a high level of knowledge of the culture
in the United States, that he is familiar with the justice system in
Shelby County, Tennessee, and that he is proficient in his knowledge
and use of the English language. He is proficient in computer skills,
including the ability to access the Internet and to use website
technology to garner resources and seek assistance from experts.
He has an aggressive personality and shows no propensity to be deterred
or intimidated. He is a thoughtful and deliberate person who exhibits
a proclivity to calculate, plan, and carefully predetermine his action
and behaviors. At all times relevant to this case, Mr. He has demonstrated
the ability to access knowledgeable advisors in any area in which he needs
assistance, to scrutinize the advice given, and, if dissatisfied with the
advice, reject the advice and seek out other advisors.
_ Since 1998, Mr. He has repeatedly engaged in a pattern of conduct marked
by deceitfulness and dishonesty, without remorse, repentance, or conscience,
and has shown a propensity to justify all means, including perjury, for what
Mr. He deems to be justifiable ends.
_ Mr. He admitted that he lied about his income, under oath, in his December
20, 2001, deposition and that he said things that he knew were not the truth.
During his deposition, Mr. He also knowingly and willfully gave false
testimony with respect to material facts concerning his and Mrs. He’s assets.
The Court has previously found that Mr. He committed perjury while under
oath in Court hearings and pleadings filed in this cause.
_ The Court reaffirms and incorporates herein by reference the findings made
by the Court relative to the perjury of Mr. He in testimony given before the
Court on February 14, 2002, as memorialized in the February 22, 2002, order
entitled “Judgment On Order To Show Cause Pertaining To Passport” and the
order entitled “Judgment On Order To Show Cause Pertaining To Documentation
Of Marriage In The Republic Of China.”
_ The evidence also shows that Mr. He tried to procure an F-2 visa, in 1997,
for another Chinese woman, who Mr. He claimed was his wife. Mr. He later
admitted that this woman was not his wife and that he had committed a fraud
on the University of Memphis. |
发表于 2004-5-14 00:54:55
