|
|
洛杉机华人区爬藤探讨
7 K9 r5 ^8 Z" E
" _- x# j8 f' M# D来源Aresident于2011-05-01
" p( p W: _: R6 ?3 z# E
! S+ L5 O5 t! @/ T, L. e$ T# @7 {9 ~2 H2 A
最近小孩小学毕业，我也开始对洛杉机华人区高中开始研究。不怕诸位砸砖，我是比较热衷爬大藤。现在和大家分享一些信息，抛砖引玉。信息不全，请洛杉机华人朋友多多补充。我心目中的大藤含五所大学，Harvard, Yale, Stanford, MIT, Princeton.洛杉机好的私高，有Polytech, Harvard Westlake, and Chadwick,很难考进，学费较高。洛杉机华人区，学区好的有Whitney High (Cerritos), San Marino, Arcadia, South Pasadena, Walnut, Diamond Bar, University High (Irvine)，Parlos Verdes (Peninsula High and Parlos Verdes High), La Canada. 这些学校很多不公布爬藤报喜榜，所以我的信息支离破碎，请大家补充。Whitney High在南加公立高中排名第一，需选拔入学，亚裔众 多(74.9% Asian, 7.3% White), 2010年高三有169名学生,爬大藤方面，是3 accepted by Stanford and 1 by Yale，其余可能是0，似乎难以匹配南加第一的名头。San Marino是南加传统白人富人区，只有single family house,不过现在已沦陷，成了亚裔富人区，高三约282学生,约63% Asian and 28% white。2010年有3 for Stanford and 2 for Yale，比想象中华人西区第一名校有些距离。Arcadia应是华人西区第二名校，人口涵盖很多富人，中产，及少数新移民， 也有小孩在上学而父母在国内的。学生众多，高三约887人。69% Asian and 18% white. 2010年有1 for Harvard, 2 for MIT, 3 for Princeton, 3 for Stanford, and 2 for Yale.Walnut and Diamond Bar是华人东区名校，不过我没能找到爬藤数据。Parlos Verdes离华人中心区较为远，华人较不熟悉，Peninsula High 2010年有580高三学生，39% Asian and 45% Caucasian，6 for Harvard, 5 for MIT, 5 for Princeton, 10 for Stanford, and 3 for Yale.整体而言我有以下观察：华人占多数的高中名校，以Whitney High, San Marino High, and Arcadia High 为代表，1。似乎爬藤比例并不高，与国内的名校如人大附中爬北清差距较大。2。过去十年似乎爬藤有滑落趋势。 原因是什么呢？我有以下猜测：1.藤校一般较注重综合素质如领袖能力和社区服务，又讲究学生的独特性如某方面的特殊才能（体育，艺术，研究），会不会是我 们华人家长太注重成绩(GPA and SAT)，而忽略了全面发展？2。种族因素。可能顶级私立大学就是不想招太多亚裔？请大家讨论。
( z& C0 d7 y; ]4 U9 H9 ]0 z0 k+ @1 y7 i9 Q" a. M V
9 w- p* v9 G0 q( | U
8 E" u; H. N. s: O+ w0 _& U$ l$ V补充：7 ?0 q& {: i) ]
7 j% Q/ R1 k2 c1 {* m$ h" B* ?* RTop 25 of America's Best High Schools - Gold Medal Rank! Z, J& V( C$ o
7 f- U, F" s% S) x. N
1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology3 C$ H6 n' o. y" |) S8 a& X
, g# G5 {, r* s" K9 h) }Location: Alexandria, VA; O5 q! X/ w! z. ]3 N
Enrollment: 1,805
1 ?9 {/ I2 R4 s# UEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 1.3
; d1 i# |( m8 e& AMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 4.9
) q0 H9 T/ v' z3 x. rQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 6.9$ ~1 Z) Q: A2 W
College Readiness Index: 100.0/ L0 w! N& n+ y7 b* {
S! E0 C' W( y2 n2 ]2. International Academy/ w v# a0 ~1 X
6 A, ?. v. z& n4 _
Location: Bloomfield Hills, MI
/ H: ^2 Z' k1 E/ qEnrollment: 157
# P. n7 N4 D+ u3 f) ^1 UEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.6
2 R8 L8 O5 z }* X+ h$ V8 c# s3 DMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 3.23 g# A* K& m( `/ _' k2 T
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.7
$ \& Y( C- p+ ]College Readiness Index: 100.0
" y4 p. W! b* }& W7 d3 X; M! X% ]7 ]& _+ ~2 n' O: K' c5 q
3. Whitney High School
% M; A5 ~+ k: v3 W' ^! x! N- \0 D) M. |! C/ J7 l" C- b' f, ]* h% i# S
Location: Cerritos, CA
( F& U' ]# h: u% N) q* l6 jEnrollment: 984
2 X' Y- j: V# f; {& C: E3 o o4 vEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 11.00 K9 I+ Q! q; w
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 11.54 N4 _4 F _ N. [5 H ^
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.1; S! v' L B' A. Z0 J) ?( I- K6 q
College Readiness Index: 100.0
k3 p" g: y8 E: a/ k
5 u |! q' z. @. _4. Oxford Academy6 W& I* N, r0 g- F. Z5 P% s# ]4 i
# R7 O' W# Y `% Z: kLocation: Cypress, CA
) x9 ]! Y0 S, G$ i$ A. REnrollment: 1.021
; h- ^5 b4 M, {. PEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 19.0( E$ C. F! x8 x$ f' D: S
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 12.7, A r/ H. ^7 K% L
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.0* ~" y9 a R G0 M2 B6 k
College Readiness Index: 100.0
3 y' Z8 I6 {1 `
1 L; t" {* E- w2 A5. School for the Talented and Gifted at Yvonne A. Ewell Townview Center
* c" k4 S( z! B* c- M+ f. r4 \2 N
Location: Dallas, TX
4 K! l" W3 f' k8 o5 LEnrollment: 209
7 T! u$ @! [- \ M. F' QEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 24.91 |2 V) z `, ^7 g n
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 51.2
7 [$ \; E6 J' L& a& m* p7 wQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 8.0
+ W6 C( K1 b5 j+ e+ n7 c0 P% DCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
# E$ t* R: R( g. A% _% W$ X( E; L9 d/ R) b/ k
6. Newcomers High School3 G% }, b0 e% K, l7 g6 w* G- _9 B
4 ^6 m& F) V* P2 C+ ^5 B
Location: Long Island City, NY3 Q( r5 ]7 ?: I/ H. f9 T* e3 j2 ?
Enrollment: 1,016
' }% W! a4 n# Q7 G) b* ]" uEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 79.0' f# n1 L4 z: m# ^3 s# n( x
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 60.7
1 Z5 F' ?$ N) M) C$ A- q2 jQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 1.68 b% P; Q7 x% {5 J; W& }, M% X
College Readiness Index: 100.0
7 P j4 m! d4 p
6 L- J( d- T4 ~1 f: J$ W# T( X7. Pacific Collegiate School4 x( ~/ d0 p- D" L8 e
* V' P7 B. E+ Q8 [Location: Santa Cruz, CA
6 {, A. }" t- U3 k$ f$ ~Enrollment: 383+ }7 ]6 r' n/ D. q* B4 o( ]' u- |
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.0
. l0 n1 X. X+ Q2 y/ iMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 8.4
2 y0 e4 a9 ^% G7 FQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.5; h, ~5 O4 M# w' L6 z0 U. E0 V
College Readiness Index: 100.0
. r# E; k% r1 \) k& v& J4 V: z, a, r
3 i. h/ W/ m& I i+ U2 q8. School of Science and Engineering Magnet9 h+ R7 M- d6 e( b" r
" ^5 E, X, m1 l: Q7 I; O. M' r
Location: Dallas, TX& d, L1 O! d" L: {4 o0 l2 s3 e
Enrollment: 391
. X, T9 H( r) S! C: @9 U8 w# @Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 48.3
) W) K- N1 f! ~3 u5 AMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 72.4
, Z) K7 u# l! S K) c0 j: K4 dQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.1
- I8 T! a# q6 M6 k9 v- g fCollege Readiness Index: 100.0$ W4 D& d/ Z4 \" _; a9 f
/ x t5 ]3 Z4 R% l U5 o9. BASIS Tucson0 @! e/ }- \* Z! n$ s# O
& D! B$ \ |1 C/ P" e7 s5 _' `Location: Tucson, AZ2 g6 ?* K- V$ N$ N7 u! v# I! p% f
Enrollment: 527: T' @* |( W z% e; ]; F( z+ d
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.0- V( E0 m$ ]9 u* |
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 24.9
- j. P8 ^, d8 z. m8 XQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.7* A1 Z% _, ^% N- k3 p3 R0 \
College Readiness Index: 100.0/ R5 Y. j& r) P- L2 k
7 W! ~* o5 W2 |" x) h4 M9 @10. International School9 T* b( |3 ^$ i& k8 e7 ?% ~" I. x
' L4 r- F' `! r% r. K- w
Location: Bellevue, WA! _' z$ N- G7 b' U% [5 u# ^4 N
Enrollment: 509
1 Z, ]' v* k8 {7 y$ r. Y! qEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 3.6
/ H6 O; C( i" k2 P9 tMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 1.7
' ~2 j/ k# m4 y# vQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 3.8
# I$ K* U' X1 [College Readiness Index: 100.0 |
|
发表于 2011-10-22 06:26:18
