|
|
洛杉机华人区爬藤探讨/ K5 X! q% d5 {% ^, `$ l
* z/ \" ~8 K( P1 r% T+ r
来源Aresident于2011-05-01
# _4 c) k! n X. m) q! ?$ A, ~ V0 c& ]7 Z
2 t8 Y! Y5 W0 q% r Q9 p最近小孩小学毕业，我也开始对洛杉机华人区高中开始研究。不怕诸位砸砖，我是比较热衷爬大藤。现在和大家分享一些信息，抛砖引玉。信息不全，请洛杉机华人朋友多多补充。我心目中的大藤含五所大学，Harvard, Yale, Stanford, MIT, Princeton.洛杉机好的私高，有Polytech, Harvard Westlake, and Chadwick,很难考进，学费较高。洛杉机华人区，学区好的有Whitney High (Cerritos), San Marino, Arcadia, South Pasadena, Walnut, Diamond Bar, University High (Irvine)，Parlos Verdes (Peninsula High and Parlos Verdes High), La Canada. 这些学校很多不公布爬藤报喜榜，所以我的信息支离破碎，请大家补充。Whitney High在南加公立高中排名第一，需选拔入学，亚裔众 多(74.9% Asian, 7.3% White), 2010年高三有169名学生,爬大藤方面，是3 accepted by Stanford and 1 by Yale，其余可能是0，似乎难以匹配南加第一的名头。San Marino是南加传统白人富人区，只有single family house,不过现在已沦陷，成了亚裔富人区，高三约282学生,约63% Asian and 28% white。2010年有3 for Stanford and 2 for Yale，比想象中华人西区第一名校有些距离。Arcadia应是华人西区第二名校，人口涵盖很多富人，中产，及少数新移民， 也有小孩在上学而父母在国内的。学生众多，高三约887人。69% Asian and 18% white. 2010年有1 for Harvard, 2 for MIT, 3 for Princeton, 3 for Stanford, and 2 for Yale.Walnut and Diamond Bar是华人东区名校，不过我没能找到爬藤数据。Parlos Verdes离华人中心区较为远，华人较不熟悉，Peninsula High 2010年有580高三学生，39% Asian and 45% Caucasian，6 for Harvard, 5 for MIT, 5 for Princeton, 10 for Stanford, and 3 for Yale.整体而言我有以下观察：华人占多数的高中名校，以Whitney High, San Marino High, and Arcadia High 为代表，1。似乎爬藤比例并不高，与国内的名校如人大附中爬北清差距较大。2。过去十年似乎爬藤有滑落趋势。 原因是什么呢？我有以下猜测：1.藤校一般较注重综合素质如领袖能力和社区服务，又讲究学生的独特性如某方面的特殊才能（体育，艺术，研究），会不会是我 们华人家长太注重成绩(GPA and SAT)，而忽略了全面发展？2。种族因素。可能顶级私立大学就是不想招太多亚裔？请大家讨论。3 j5 F c. q$ ?: x7 l G
9 V i: d! G1 M3 ?( ^" S, X5 `
9 ^* j2 A% v7 w5 m* o9 j
$ w& e. I! Z5 y! m- C% N5 E0 O补充：4 I: \( O* s( S) Z# B2 o8 B
, j( y. O; O4 N$ X8 I/ p) ^! CTop 25 of America's Best High Schools - Gold Medal Rank
% R7 i% ~9 m* P
6 Q; v5 v1 t) O# |1 _& S8 w2 t1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology1 P6 P4 o) U6 w. I9 G4 } y9 \
0 z( P6 ? W; C- @) K/ `) n* r
Location: Alexandria, VA
) d- L5 `7 ^& e0 {' cEnrollment: 1,8052 m% x# R7 o0 m7 S8 b5 L% n; A
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 1.3
4 T& v7 J+ X, m; _+ T$ rMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 4.9) c4 J' E+ o# a+ `
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 6.9
" X0 X' T% I$ z: f( E, j7 G+ d! cCollege Readiness Index: 100.0" E- W( f+ ]. b2 j) f: m! K; w
3 W# ?, H+ q% a' O `* L; Y) S
2. International Academy& }& s( Y; ?* n( b3 F
% u" ?: \& s( Z; Y' n+ K2 A( W; l) O
Location: Bloomfield Hills, MI9 v# x2 G4 l7 c% F% C+ m5 F! V# q2 Q
Enrollment: 157' m9 \. V5 X; m" l* |. Z
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.6
1 j1 B3 G4 Z+ J5 c4 w0 `Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 3.2
# j5 m/ p) W: ?) GQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.7
0 m. P: K. v jCollege Readiness Index: 100.0 p/ \% ~2 w$ Y) O- T" {( S# j: g; `/ Z4 I
# B' d! K! |, a5 \, y" x3. Whitney High School1 r! Q' t6 p; _0 [$ t
! d- K$ W8 U& l4 _
Location: Cerritos, CA6 \( W) v- p, z( w# d
Enrollment: 984: U2 d1 c1 e2 U! D3 B) Q
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 11.06 b7 x* s+ M2 q+ \* \1 B
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 11.5
! D4 [. m+ P* VQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.1
% W2 ^5 h' A2 M8 i5 `8 y! lCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
* g9 M! A( v8 B+ [% P; V
3 R" U; c" J( Z4 f4. Oxford Academy ]0 }1 o l: f1 q
, ^" w5 T; F$ C
Location: Cypress, CA9 C4 H! V2 j5 g* f( [- C
Enrollment: 1.021
8 R$ H0 R$ a- ?( BEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 19.0' D% z- h8 K, q- p# q
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 12.7; |: x9 B- k4 u4 D; s5 l
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.0
5 ^/ q: y/ J+ \- M1 A6 bCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
5 J" v: V; \* ]$ J9 s P0 K6 A: ~7 w4 H0 g7 `! L& }
5. School for the Talented and Gifted at Yvonne A. Ewell Townview Center* g Z& v: ^1 F' {6 O3 J
p& [. k# b) ^# h5 ?8 |
Location: Dallas, TX
" t* l% v) y- i. |- L! Z! |Enrollment: 209
- U1 p/ A# f& i- H. r" ZEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 24.9
9 M- u1 q( T/ _( l ~( }Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 51.2
! j8 F1 T1 J: Q- I% D0 _ }* uQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 8.0
, A# t) o2 V& C8 tCollege Readiness Index: 100.0, E x4 K3 _6 \9 l" O) I& O
) A- P9 d8 r/ M/ C' }. F
6. Newcomers High School
2 h( l( L V. e& x2 n
3 U% ?* G+ j; DLocation: Long Island City, NY: D- b) m1 @3 c- I" \4 J, k' w
Enrollment: 1,016
6 \. B$ G2 g. `0 fEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 79.0
5 ~4 S2 c/ `' n4 T: Q" k- w& KMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 60.7% S! _$ a6 A& S& p+ B
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 1.6
6 W: M1 w8 `6 T8 K& T5 ~8 _College Readiness Index: 100.0
1 }; D/ u7 B8 c
$ X$ C, m1 J1 K4 c3 u7. Pacific Collegiate School5 V5 a3 t$ u9 H; i1 D
' }1 K$ I9 O0 M( d9 Z
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
8 i& g- I4 q& r$ W: N0 ?Enrollment: 3839 I6 E* g8 S5 t( y5 Q
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.0
5 s' W, w' a8 t2 m6 [4 VMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 8.4# @- ^+ u& `" ~
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.5/ `% h( S5 H& L4 y8 W8 b3 X1 Y% e. u$ u
College Readiness Index: 100.0
( H* p) N& Q7 }
) n$ v* S' U$ S& B$ w8 B8. School of Science and Engineering Magnet
2 ~& E7 \# u& @, }$ S( J
* [( N. L; o; g8 oLocation: Dallas, TX
! v$ w1 V7 U Z! s+ I! FEnrollment: 3915 k( f: V% a3 Y8 I/ L
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 48.3! }9 h2 [1 z7 C }: t B: r6 D
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 72.4+ o$ G( F Z6 D* F8 ?9 n; \- Q
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.1* a% u+ H3 s' {
College Readiness Index: 100.0
7 Z" ]4 g4 P" ]( Z& G P2 N1 v$ }# V$ D- ~. b( J
9. BASIS Tucson/ l9 M: B5 V E& Y
9 }& Y5 }$ M7 g! f0 V- h+ dLocation: Tucson, AZ& Z% j" j) m6 }
Enrollment: 527( H$ f0 B0 t7 S& i( x
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.0. g- n0 b6 v# x: f$ C% O/ G
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 24.9
+ u2 ]2 _- A" U o Y& f* f$ VQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.74 P, G3 x( T3 N/ ~! }- V2 A" g
College Readiness Index: 100.03 L& @! d; f8 Y) k
. a! H! j, p9 ^ z7 J8 C10. International School( v% V' P4 O# i8 q1 ?8 |8 n, Z6 }* G
9 B- H: }# S! M6 W! `1 KLocation: Bellevue, WA K7 e. r$ B" q
Enrollment: 509
' |1 j1 v ^7 y9 E, O/ `Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 3.62 m4 \6 B; r& N
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 1.7) p4 G* ]: ]3 [7 r: g
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 3.8
( Y7 x( u$ q4 u' i4 E1 mCollege Readiness Index: 100.0 |
|
发表于 2011-10-22 06:26:18
