|
|
洛杉机华人区爬藤探讨3 D1 {; @6 X! c# H) m
2 n9 P9 R9 {; A& T* [/ m3 a# x* J来源Aresident于2011-05-01 d1 C/ ~2 ^7 s# F9 m
& }' z/ [2 n/ C" a7 R2 J" [6 i
2 R, o& E: e, U) c; l最近小孩小学毕业，我也开始对洛杉机华人区高中开始研究。不怕诸位砸砖，我是比较热衷爬大藤。现在和大家分享一些信息，抛砖引玉。信息不全，请洛杉机华人朋友多多补充。我心目中的大藤含五所大学，Harvard, Yale, Stanford, MIT, Princeton.洛杉机好的私高，有Polytech, Harvard Westlake, and Chadwick,很难考进，学费较高。洛杉机华人区，学区好的有Whitney High (Cerritos), San Marino, Arcadia, South Pasadena, Walnut, Diamond Bar, University High (Irvine)，Parlos Verdes (Peninsula High and Parlos Verdes High), La Canada. 这些学校很多不公布爬藤报喜榜，所以我的信息支离破碎，请大家补充。Whitney High在南加公立高中排名第一，需选拔入学，亚裔众 多(74.9% Asian, 7.3% White), 2010年高三有169名学生,爬大藤方面，是3 accepted by Stanford and 1 by Yale，其余可能是0，似乎难以匹配南加第一的名头。San Marino是南加传统白人富人区，只有single family house,不过现在已沦陷，成了亚裔富人区，高三约282学生,约63% Asian and 28% white。2010年有3 for Stanford and 2 for Yale，比想象中华人西区第一名校有些距离。Arcadia应是华人西区第二名校，人口涵盖很多富人，中产，及少数新移民， 也有小孩在上学而父母在国内的。学生众多，高三约887人。69% Asian and 18% white. 2010年有1 for Harvard, 2 for MIT, 3 for Princeton, 3 for Stanford, and 2 for Yale.Walnut and Diamond Bar是华人东区名校，不过我没能找到爬藤数据。Parlos Verdes离华人中心区较为远，华人较不熟悉，Peninsula High 2010年有580高三学生，39% Asian and 45% Caucasian，6 for Harvard, 5 for MIT, 5 for Princeton, 10 for Stanford, and 3 for Yale.整体而言我有以下观察：华人占多数的高中名校，以Whitney High, San Marino High, and Arcadia High 为代表，1。似乎爬藤比例并不高，与国内的名校如人大附中爬北清差距较大。2。过去十年似乎爬藤有滑落趋势。 原因是什么呢？我有以下猜测：1.藤校一般较注重综合素质如领袖能力和社区服务，又讲究学生的独特性如某方面的特殊才能（体育，艺术，研究），会不会是我 们华人家长太注重成绩(GPA and SAT)，而忽略了全面发展？2。种族因素。可能顶级私立大学就是不想招太多亚裔？请大家讨论。; V" J. }8 ^5 h1 Q4 W/ G# c3 M
; M% l" k3 J: e* L- n
8 f- y5 |" y1 d
4 w6 v+ q4 \6 J$ A% J补充：
; y* _0 {9 x" G
$ `- `8 e; F, M# c3 A5 ~4 wTop 25 of America's Best High Schools - Gold Medal Rank3 x3 p; R: Z3 }2 \9 y3 M
" n, F) X6 |( G: D$ ?) G3 z9 \ v1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology
1 x7 x- |0 g' L% l" j/ `9 P
+ N; p3 P0 m+ X" s" rLocation: Alexandria, VA
$ w) H( x+ R% r- R# ?Enrollment: 1,8056 J3 W7 }5 v/ F' q: I0 k
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 1.3
+ N* j2 t7 a: _Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 4.9& J3 \* ^+ N$ \& O/ f
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 6.9
5 S$ W( ]: t+ q9 ICollege Readiness Index: 100.0
+ g) r: q% \9 S8 R( E6 q' s) Y/ K% [# Z, R l- y
2. International Academy
6 e) c" B2 R+ i& R% I) H
5 B: x7 l+ s* U& [8 MLocation: Bloomfield Hills, MI. Y. d, f% w/ o& K
Enrollment: 157
3 D3 |" J7 j; D8 N/ g) zEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.6
* f* Q8 a7 E R" v$ UMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 3.2$ @* T: |; Z" j
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.7
y0 i' Q, b/ K$ hCollege Readiness Index: 100.07 F- U1 N" n1 ]
, `2 M& H$ w+ S$ b$ u3. Whitney High School
$ Y+ M1 T! `: r9 I! T" A/ k# ^5 _
: c/ ?, l J V( |Location: Cerritos, CA
# o! k, n7 Y( r& W$ R3 ~. S! v2 _Enrollment: 984: b B" i) ]/ C# ^. w# c# u
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 11.0
% j/ z3 ^6 M. }0 mMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 11.5
! e+ z) n0 D3 H; w/ ?2 [) NQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.1
! @) ~2 f, r5 l1 N7 a' FCollege Readiness Index: 100.09 }! q/ |) L8 i
+ Y$ ^3 W- J4 [3 `, r0 ~, U4. Oxford Academy
9 Z2 v- R& b# w1 L! Q& w
: h! d. F% ~+ B: E R5 E0 tLocation: Cypress, CA
L' \3 M) R n( {, \3 @9 iEnrollment: 1.021
3 ^* {- K, x, _3 y; REconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 19.0# z. G0 T9 _: S B) {: B
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 12.76 F+ z' a8 o4 y! k4 S! @' H! {/ m
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.00 Y: U2 u% Y; j# [& A
College Readiness Index: 100.0
* F0 k% A( e. M! ` t) a! h# I6 f5 k0 }
5. School for the Talented and Gifted at Yvonne A. Ewell Townview Center
+ L1 |6 m0 T8 h4 K0 ]5 X% x- @
( D) q+ q) _( o- Q" ~* ZLocation: Dallas, TX* L5 M# o8 ^- |5 G7 p
Enrollment: 209: E" d; N. r" L& U# O* |; c
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 24.9 g( `+ M, D$ v$ x
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 51.2
6 r# R+ e4 T& B: ^ E( nQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 8.0
7 i( F- P% h7 z: c5 ^" h5 rCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
- G0 u3 W* M ? K6 j: A9 d
4 G5 k( e$ w8 x& D9 L7 [+ _( O' ]. ]' m6. Newcomers High School y7 `1 E* L7 ]3 x8 F
' O d; m% W8 Z9 k9 ^
Location: Long Island City, NY1 ^6 P( |% R; c
Enrollment: 1,016) ]; v) N& T# O1 q' u
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 79.0
* A: D3 b5 t; t# C8 M4 LMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 60.7) p2 \( W2 G/ f% T
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 1.6
8 Z" x* A3 q4 X4 i, h0 I \8 F4 R: X& |/ nCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
$ S( O) b4 l) u8 L$ B. {" v& R% D' w5 H. a9 P) O7 V, d! r
7. Pacific Collegiate School/ ^8 a% S8 q. D9 V9 y6 x
% z" S3 i# ]8 f2 g: H. i: ZLocation: Santa Cruz, CA* n J6 x- l% @+ S. e' H' ?) H
Enrollment: 3830 _6 {/ N8 z# y9 H
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.0* a+ ?1 Q9 I; V# B' V5 [5 s
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 8.4; T! B" n* C( M9 d. I# \* P
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.5
/ M; q3 M; E3 V1 H8 ^/ @8 P6 N! LCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
) x0 @7 X5 Z7 M8 x" N/ `9 |+ P0 f$ \. F/ H! Q% @( l5 P) b: q1 o4 u8 z
8. School of Science and Engineering Magnet, c) ?+ L) Y2 F& I" f
: D; p+ S |) G8 {! t. r4 oLocation: Dallas, TX3 l, C; A' F6 o7 n2 Y$ I5 G. d
Enrollment: 391$ U% _" A) O+ C8 a1 B- Y
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 48.3) c- F0 O4 ^8 `9 j( j! `+ ]. F. t
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 72.4" Q) E1 n3 P# c( |8 Q& W" i
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.1
+ i2 W+ V7 G- oCollege Readiness Index: 100.0, T. S# b R3 ~0 [
) G* Q$ I" o* }+ E- B' m" e2 h9. BASIS Tucson
G1 f) q2 D5 T W: k U
( m6 n( S% }1 N6 u- j$ m9 i9 O) {: NLocation: Tucson, AZ3 V5 g% ^8 s, B/ ^, \
Enrollment: 527
0 T) Q: Z# B; ^# W( GEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.01 p9 e: r' p& `) U& P9 J6 e
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 24.9: ~2 Z; H& r; z& m0 Y
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.7
# |$ K6 L( [0 J* yCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
2 h8 Z+ b G! z: O- u* t# J. }3 n4 N( L3 a
10. International School, P; D8 D" b; N: N- L
+ ^1 ~1 t; S3 g0 C: \5 v9 d9 i
Location: Bellevue, WA# ? q* g/ P+ b- Q' G H
Enrollment: 509
" u; o7 W* X: c2 K- n. e7 ~' l. P) kEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 3.6! G) N3 I, |& u& @2 }3 F2 w4 B
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 1.7
3 Y) u$ @/ X; zQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 3.8
, ^: {4 G: N2 ]: p3 ECollege Readiness Index: 100.0 |
|
发表于 2011-10-22 06:26:18
