|
|
洛杉机华人区爬藤探讨
( n3 a8 F$ }+ e; C! a6 K# t1 v
3 Z3 G" N: r7 y2 \来源Aresident于2011-05-01+ b! S9 n. h: ^$ i+ _2 h' g
$ P8 s7 }9 O7 C& v k/ V/ C5 b. {% B9 g. K/ g Q; o. H
最近小孩小学毕业，我也开始对洛杉机华人区高中开始研究。不怕诸位砸砖，我是比较热衷爬大藤。现在和大家分享一些信息，抛砖引玉。信息不全，请洛杉机华人朋友多多补充。我心目中的大藤含五所大学，Harvard, Yale, Stanford, MIT, Princeton.洛杉机好的私高，有Polytech, Harvard Westlake, and Chadwick,很难考进，学费较高。洛杉机华人区，学区好的有Whitney High (Cerritos), San Marino, Arcadia, South Pasadena, Walnut, Diamond Bar, University High (Irvine)，Parlos Verdes (Peninsula High and Parlos Verdes High), La Canada. 这些学校很多不公布爬藤报喜榜，所以我的信息支离破碎，请大家补充。Whitney High在南加公立高中排名第一，需选拔入学，亚裔众 多(74.9% Asian, 7.3% White), 2010年高三有169名学生,爬大藤方面，是3 accepted by Stanford and 1 by Yale，其余可能是0，似乎难以匹配南加第一的名头。San Marino是南加传统白人富人区，只有single family house,不过现在已沦陷，成了亚裔富人区，高三约282学生,约63% Asian and 28% white。2010年有3 for Stanford and 2 for Yale，比想象中华人西区第一名校有些距离。Arcadia应是华人西区第二名校，人口涵盖很多富人，中产，及少数新移民， 也有小孩在上学而父母在国内的。学生众多，高三约887人。69% Asian and 18% white. 2010年有1 for Harvard, 2 for MIT, 3 for Princeton, 3 for Stanford, and 2 for Yale.Walnut and Diamond Bar是华人东区名校，不过我没能找到爬藤数据。Parlos Verdes离华人中心区较为远，华人较不熟悉，Peninsula High 2010年有580高三学生，39% Asian and 45% Caucasian，6 for Harvard, 5 for MIT, 5 for Princeton, 10 for Stanford, and 3 for Yale.整体而言我有以下观察：华人占多数的高中名校，以Whitney High, San Marino High, and Arcadia High 为代表，1。似乎爬藤比例并不高，与国内的名校如人大附中爬北清差距较大。2。过去十年似乎爬藤有滑落趋势。 原因是什么呢？我有以下猜测：1.藤校一般较注重综合素质如领袖能力和社区服务，又讲究学生的独特性如某方面的特殊才能（体育，艺术，研究），会不会是我 们华人家长太注重成绩(GPA and SAT)，而忽略了全面发展？2。种族因素。可能顶级私立大学就是不想招太多亚裔？请大家讨论。, w* j* c# B" m* ?- U$ E( J
P0 ~: P$ P) t% d+ R r3 F
6 {) _$ t' c6 R) |9 E# e5 y- M1 I, Z. z9 Q4 M. w
补充：1 C/ F# o: R5 f# J: z
9 f' g" r8 ^& l: E3 i `) o" s2 XTop 25 of America's Best High Schools - Gold Medal Rank: h5 D& i% Z [2 @, J5 T# \, R
" B; H! g1 V6 a8 }1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology% z/ T% h. s& H1 @3 w0 L6 Z
# |7 J- _% u3 C+ KLocation: Alexandria, VA% F! h* e x+ I1 q }1 a5 S* a
Enrollment: 1,805
6 v* Q- V5 c6 e' tEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 1.3& a! P% _! M/ q; e! k
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 4.9) |, E# h* Y5 L
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 6.9
# m+ B9 l/ J5 x9 j* k! VCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
- D) x! x' U7 d" e. p5 P! W$ O& y) l( o0 I3 M: c
2. International Academy- W$ O# W7 [( x) t$ U- S
7 e/ u |* J0 S. P3 HLocation: Bloomfield Hills, MI1 }' |+ B4 O, y: }, O- W7 Y2 Y2 E+ S4 R
Enrollment: 157
Q! F* \, @6 o- m1 h7 n" P: _ LEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.6) z: i+ I$ |* p, t
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 3.2
, Z& h# V/ I" \2 ZQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.7- j6 N2 W4 E6 P1 z3 x
College Readiness Index: 100.0
. ]4 W1 z( k( v& Y% S! P9 P/ ~" X/ E& Y4 j# }
3. Whitney High School
8 |4 `0 m- ~, ~5 d
. S; ]1 `& z- b/ D+ N$ J1 MLocation: Cerritos, CA2 H/ R# P5 s& t( M# r0 b
Enrollment: 984( T% R5 h& @; T+ _$ L
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 11.0
) j: b3 S' Z4 V7 ]# H+ o6 JMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 11.5
/ N0 c# S8 X/ u- e2 @2 n/ {: RQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.18 d4 ~: L9 A- y/ F. v0 A
College Readiness Index: 100.0
. |; X- H& ^" Z6 T1 T% C! g& {' H4 A3 i, j2 w; k
4. Oxford Academy& J. \4 H* V4 v6 A n' {
) K' u& M a: s' a7 n" H0 ?
Location: Cypress, CA) Q3 c$ r" x4 x, ?
Enrollment: 1.021
4 o/ I' |! a3 N8 pEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 19.0$ I- {8 z" y3 Y; I& d9 A6 _, x
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 12.7
& |- q4 B- L5 Z* x# h" U% AQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.08 c) K; {1 K/ C4 }% ~2 E
College Readiness Index: 100.0- s j. G4 h- L5 F% ~- o( S
5 b2 u1 D0 p7 u8 _5. School for the Talented and Gifted at Yvonne A. Ewell Townview Center
0 ]8 D) `" i' N2 X& c. f) i; H
0 J* u% G* E# P! N9 g7 fLocation: Dallas, TX, [/ S2 [ P" y4 Q
Enrollment: 209. `8 g. X. ?* `5 J
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 24.9$ z+ |* F% B1 p2 l
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 51.2
/ K. Q! \+ a* I2 q8 b5 RQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 8.0
& H* d$ G! s" `+ S+ [College Readiness Index: 100.0) t% z* C' b: W$ Q+ g
+ d* O9 X4 K2 p, M) B! H3 a; {6 I6. Newcomers High School. e x" }5 l3 H3 d- H
) n8 [# n$ R1 |2 |/ Z& G6 o7 j% j
Location: Long Island City, NY* b" g8 v0 T8 {
Enrollment: 1,016+ X* f) c3 `( h g+ o
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 79.05 S6 |: ?" m3 r; b4 \, Y0 ~$ ~ B r6 c
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 60.79 Y9 y5 n0 _# a3 @) C2 i
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 1.63 F& b! P' h' z* l( ]$ S$ r i
College Readiness Index: 100.08 V) @( }. T5 H' r: C
0 _, |7 y/ U. H% s0 T, f+ w ^& X* C# l7. Pacific Collegiate School, @: U" @4 i* @- i1 r
0 ?3 _" S9 @* |. I. b4 mLocation: Santa Cruz, CA
! d9 ~0 y7 m: mEnrollment: 383
' ? A) l" n" r7 ^7 o; g0 LEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.05 `, Y8 s. d, Q% x" _$ g& J
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 8.4& w$ v1 E. S: s' }. y8 g; O: _
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.5
' N2 d5 K8 [& }) y7 d7 SCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
v( e/ Z1 L/ J6 e/ O% \
2 h8 _, w4 P8 A/ c8. School of Science and Engineering Magnet
6 G3 G8 L- `4 j2 H9 l9 e7 \4 t- m, a" P0 q0 X
Location: Dallas, TX# } G1 v) S4 d0 r
Enrollment: 391
. `" X$ Q' h' B0 ]( C, S3 wEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 48.3" e, O/ h/ j( E8 R5 y
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 72.4 h* L! z7 \! |. J7 ~
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.13 a+ B/ P) H, N. c3 T
College Readiness Index: 100.0
/ c" \1 Z5 U( `' N) A
- ] U9 y0 H2 W9. BASIS Tucson
7 J0 @8 r$ A) O4 v$ U, A8 B
( y/ b4 f4 N* z: j) c% L$ CLocation: Tucson, AZ' S A! Z+ l, n0 n' J8 ~5 t
Enrollment: 527
1 R# R* Z v5 T: o1 R" Q( sEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.0+ B5 x0 |; a8 n& P: u5 m% n0 g
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 24.91 R; B8 r0 B7 o# B9 b( [7 C, |
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.70 a9 x: [6 R/ d2 I. t
College Readiness Index: 100.08 K) Z7 A H: h8 k8 q. o
4 I( L" R9 l2 S
10. International School
3 R- k) k+ {9 M* |% E) m% M9 P2 d+ {; h4 }$ s7 r0 Z
Location: Bellevue, WA# ?% L7 L' M) L" G
Enrollment: 5093 R* r- j! W: y' u
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 3.6
& n$ _+ x! _* @5 o; ]2 SMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 1.7% O' u/ L8 @0 _1 u) L
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 3.8' w# Z L: n* U! E' G9 n
College Readiness Index: 100.0 |
|
发表于 2011-10-22 06:26:18
