|
|
洛杉机华人区爬藤探讨& X) G8 o5 S4 f" P' ?, u: D9 i* G8 k7 z
+ A; I! O. N) T( z3 x, V
来源Aresident于2011-05-011 S$ u8 m1 K' _9 i2 E
5 |* \: N1 {4 U j$ j7 p
: q+ _4 t- i3 B. p% ^* G最近小孩小学毕业，我也开始对洛杉机华人区高中开始研究。不怕诸位砸砖，我是比较热衷爬大藤。现在和大家分享一些信息，抛砖引玉。信息不全，请洛杉机华人朋友多多补充。我心目中的大藤含五所大学，Harvard, Yale, Stanford, MIT, Princeton.洛杉机好的私高，有Polytech, Harvard Westlake, and Chadwick,很难考进，学费较高。洛杉机华人区，学区好的有Whitney High (Cerritos), San Marino, Arcadia, South Pasadena, Walnut, Diamond Bar, University High (Irvine)，Parlos Verdes (Peninsula High and Parlos Verdes High), La Canada. 这些学校很多不公布爬藤报喜榜，所以我的信息支离破碎，请大家补充。Whitney High在南加公立高中排名第一，需选拔入学，亚裔众 多(74.9% Asian, 7.3% White), 2010年高三有169名学生,爬大藤方面，是3 accepted by Stanford and 1 by Yale，其余可能是0，似乎难以匹配南加第一的名头。San Marino是南加传统白人富人区，只有single family house,不过现在已沦陷，成了亚裔富人区，高三约282学生,约63% Asian and 28% white。2010年有3 for Stanford and 2 for Yale，比想象中华人西区第一名校有些距离。Arcadia应是华人西区第二名校，人口涵盖很多富人，中产，及少数新移民， 也有小孩在上学而父母在国内的。学生众多，高三约887人。69% Asian and 18% white. 2010年有1 for Harvard, 2 for MIT, 3 for Princeton, 3 for Stanford, and 2 for Yale.Walnut and Diamond Bar是华人东区名校，不过我没能找到爬藤数据。Parlos Verdes离华人中心区较为远，华人较不熟悉，Peninsula High 2010年有580高三学生，39% Asian and 45% Caucasian，6 for Harvard, 5 for MIT, 5 for Princeton, 10 for Stanford, and 3 for Yale.整体而言我有以下观察：华人占多数的高中名校，以Whitney High, San Marino High, and Arcadia High 为代表，1。似乎爬藤比例并不高，与国内的名校如人大附中爬北清差距较大。2。过去十年似乎爬藤有滑落趋势。 原因是什么呢？我有以下猜测：1.藤校一般较注重综合素质如领袖能力和社区服务，又讲究学生的独特性如某方面的特殊才能（体育，艺术，研究），会不会是我 们华人家长太注重成绩(GPA and SAT)，而忽略了全面发展？2。种族因素。可能顶级私立大学就是不想招太多亚裔？请大家讨论。
3 t! U8 ?/ }" B: m* h9 C/ A5 v$ n$ O# d7 e& [
' m, b. K4 l: ]# d8 A: j1 D5 L3 n( q2 c' w
补充：
$ f0 e# t, W: C8 h& b
2 @9 p! Y8 g6 ~! ~1 ?Top 25 of America's Best High Schools - Gold Medal Rank
" U0 O: | G+ n6 I" E( ], C$ s; [8 P+ ^. z( ^0 s
1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology
7 I6 D& p1 O! [! E( B5 n' ]2 v4 |# P0 a" a5 r0 ^0 l
Location: Alexandria, VA
( b( {$ O3 E2 r4 E! N* dEnrollment: 1,805
) S2 r4 Y1 S+ o! e1 {6 TEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 1.3$ D5 \9 T H6 ~# i! W6 Q7 f
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 4.9
" z* [0 a" w8 ?( e, w4 @) `Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 6.92 O' ^6 \% z/ f9 L5 Y
College Readiness Index: 100.0. Y8 T1 V1 T, M4 A
: ^, Y! ]2 S+ A) K% S+ u& @
2. International Academy
' \# N% I7 G) ^% n# F( ^4 ~
0 f+ u* J! ^6 x/ \3 P- s) c! H3 MLocation: Bloomfield Hills, MI; C) z+ `0 D' d! c
Enrollment: 157. {8 A: T, b# L$ s
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.60 t$ @. J y! J* W5 @& t
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 3.2
, S ~8 ]" D0 I. w0 dQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.7
" B& D+ s, |! KCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
, G9 W* |; a6 D( h$ k6 l8 R+ U6 Q2 V+ z3 Y% k+ r' E
3. Whitney High School, A# i/ m8 j. T" b q, T8 N
4 R- j) _1 c1 u$ y
Location: Cerritos, CA8 r' V# g! {, V) {7 i. F, k1 D4 ~
Enrollment: 984
{2 ~. T. d4 p" YEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 11.01 c0 S' L ~9 T( x7 U% M ~2 V& }
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 11.57 @/ E9 L' a5 d! p4 Q8 U
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.1
8 E+ b+ _" |. y) T% sCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
. E1 {4 d8 W* p6 J$ Q2 k) X3 L) d. I* @
4. Oxford Academy b3 R% B4 F; s
1 U$ f# ?( L/ O: s+ d: y
Location: Cypress, CA
/ P0 B6 q1 p, o# a( QEnrollment: 1.021
# T# b# y( g) S" {Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 19.0* h' u2 Q. Q$ z3 S8 P' D, S( T3 h
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 12.76 r: i% \) [' d, U( |9 o$ O7 W
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.0
) ?* E& o/ J E1 u$ Y, ZCollege Readiness Index: 100.0! ^& W7 {1 D9 F$ ]2 B* w3 N
) P! a X' D9 L. ?1 Y5. School for the Talented and Gifted at Yvonne A. Ewell Townview Center
+ a( _$ ^6 i8 _0 B6 N8 L
4 V5 W: T- d: @Location: Dallas, TX! D& ?6 X# K& ^# ?0 ^$ B
Enrollment: 209; \/ @2 I( B8 @8 Z
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 24.94 d, M( q; z; a# }
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 51.2# n* P, w3 c/ ?0 }3 @ y
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 8.0
! Y& ?7 d; M" @( ?College Readiness Index: 100.02 |, f( p7 a5 e5 }* D
" l9 H* D7 U- L4 t# ~6. Newcomers High School4 [( \$ @* E, F
! r2 X; a. I* ]Location: Long Island City, NY2 w+ J0 }, k" Q) Y
Enrollment: 1,0169 ^7 H/ S# o3 {. E8 }$ e
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 79.0# `0 ]1 g6 b: @7 S+ X
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 60.7
& A* Q% Q; g- WQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 1.6- g L' H7 G% \# ]3 W
College Readiness Index: 100.0& m# J8 h7 Q7 c9 H8 r8 z3 k: F
' p2 `& _$ T/ T' w- D0 {7 n" `
7. Pacific Collegiate School
8 i3 p8 j5 _9 |+ l$ k
3 p5 J2 ^7 `- ?: P( M* H& ZLocation: Santa Cruz, CA3 ?- t4 U8 _+ ^5 A8 A
Enrollment: 383
' a. T6 {$ p; s9 a4 f) F: BEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.0" Z4 k6 B3 X3 w9 p1 @5 t; e7 g1 _7 \
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 8.49 L" B) T$ [, S
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.58 W+ G* q( b# L$ H
College Readiness Index: 100.0! A2 w/ j5 c: X1 B
7 |5 n8 g) [* g* U! l! P" b8. School of Science and Engineering Magnet! q! T" k# {3 }% m& d; p, Z0 ?- Q
9 n' {* @, J- K' ^
Location: Dallas, TX
5 R! {+ H! V8 _5 e+ O* ?Enrollment: 391, f' l, w2 @, D- Y
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 48.3
& i2 K0 m! s, A# \$ P NMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 72.4
% u* X$ l B4 ^9 E8 ?Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.1
/ b! _% \4 F) w$ h. HCollege Readiness Index: 100.08 ]( n: h W0 a$ s3 z. `/ v5 l
# j3 C. E3 Z# \
9. BASIS Tucson
' N$ `$ l) q3 q! A4 N: U' O/ B/ b7 p% ]
/ s# z7 y0 w) P% t, o* k* pLocation: Tucson, AZ
. N/ ]) z( V" n9 b) W8 F/ pEnrollment: 5274 j1 ]" U2 L6 }0 N4 T4 w7 x$ }3 p
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.0% B9 a' i, V9 F6 a/ t
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 24.9
: q0 J; p. M+ d# EQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.7
! i) W& @" Q3 i! Y' k& d3 }College Readiness Index: 100.0
" H7 ^( F5 k+ U V" W- z. P$ i' n
, z0 k& i0 G b0 ?& ]10. International School
9 X0 }4 f5 F& \9 w4 J- n) m) U! `- N. { I
Location: Bellevue, WA
) S, `( b3 J; l! e: z) U# w) SEnrollment: 509' L: j2 ]4 x1 ^! v' n8 \2 v
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 3.6( @9 m2 `) Q% \: S. s
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 1.7
" e2 a5 d' O Q( |! yQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 3.8
2 `7 G& a" j0 m! X @8 C% n. F) SCollege Readiness Index: 100.0 |
|
发表于 2011-10-22 06:26:18
