|
|
洛杉机华人区爬藤探讨
. y0 |. p/ r8 i* h
, b# e: y" u! t$ p( s来源Aresident于2011-05-01
\& B# {' q8 B
8 O, b! d2 |9 i# o+ M
. z% o5 m8 l- b! d( r最近小孩小学毕业，我也开始对洛杉机华人区高中开始研究。不怕诸位砸砖，我是比较热衷爬大藤。现在和大家分享一些信息，抛砖引玉。信息不全，请洛杉机华人朋友多多补充。我心目中的大藤含五所大学，Harvard, Yale, Stanford, MIT, Princeton.洛杉机好的私高，有Polytech, Harvard Westlake, and Chadwick,很难考进，学费较高。洛杉机华人区，学区好的有Whitney High (Cerritos), San Marino, Arcadia, South Pasadena, Walnut, Diamond Bar, University High (Irvine)，Parlos Verdes (Peninsula High and Parlos Verdes High), La Canada. 这些学校很多不公布爬藤报喜榜，所以我的信息支离破碎，请大家补充。Whitney High在南加公立高中排名第一，需选拔入学，亚裔众 多(74.9% Asian, 7.3% White), 2010年高三有169名学生,爬大藤方面，是3 accepted by Stanford and 1 by Yale，其余可能是0，似乎难以匹配南加第一的名头。San Marino是南加传统白人富人区，只有single family house,不过现在已沦陷，成了亚裔富人区，高三约282学生,约63% Asian and 28% white。2010年有3 for Stanford and 2 for Yale，比想象中华人西区第一名校有些距离。Arcadia应是华人西区第二名校，人口涵盖很多富人，中产，及少数新移民， 也有小孩在上学而父母在国内的。学生众多，高三约887人。69% Asian and 18% white. 2010年有1 for Harvard, 2 for MIT, 3 for Princeton, 3 for Stanford, and 2 for Yale.Walnut and Diamond Bar是华人东区名校，不过我没能找到爬藤数据。Parlos Verdes离华人中心区较为远，华人较不熟悉，Peninsula High 2010年有580高三学生，39% Asian and 45% Caucasian，6 for Harvard, 5 for MIT, 5 for Princeton, 10 for Stanford, and 3 for Yale.整体而言我有以下观察：华人占多数的高中名校，以Whitney High, San Marino High, and Arcadia High 为代表，1。似乎爬藤比例并不高，与国内的名校如人大附中爬北清差距较大。2。过去十年似乎爬藤有滑落趋势。 原因是什么呢？我有以下猜测：1.藤校一般较注重综合素质如领袖能力和社区服务，又讲究学生的独特性如某方面的特殊才能（体育，艺术，研究），会不会是我 们华人家长太注重成绩(GPA and SAT)，而忽略了全面发展？2。种族因素。可能顶级私立大学就是不想招太多亚裔？请大家讨论。% N! B! Y: g, J" ]5 S( |2 a! ]
8 o" g# W# Z5 Q/ A e* }# R0 U. K3 t- I
( Z& ~& q& A& S
补充：8 Z# d/ t7 K( Q# V, n6 c7 l
8 L# h9 T: c3 M1 s( P6 ?
Top 25 of America's Best High Schools - Gold Medal Rank
6 b; D' R* \2 c8 V3 v* Z
3 Q! n, j2 z1 d+ O1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology
. A7 s: N! q+ q2 P
3 R; _) Z% K6 L' G$ MLocation: Alexandria, VA+ m" T+ S$ l9 ~* k6 a7 P& N
Enrollment: 1,805
9 Q/ V8 v) A3 ~0 k/ eEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 1.3
$ R$ q% c b% p$ i9 T( pMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 4.97 \0 @/ v7 r3 W4 ~ u
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 6.9; u1 z6 [$ P; Y7 U9 t- O) B
College Readiness Index: 100.0
2 F0 q% J' s; J* ^. t' t* o$ I
9 M) C3 Z& [5 F! |) E( O. T6 T, D2. International Academy
4 {2 T9 ?: }5 a! K$ j- q" U% E+ _: j
5 W. d$ Y+ }/ A% [Location: Bloomfield Hills, MI/ X& A" t) |8 s
Enrollment: 157& L5 y, e, M `* N) D
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.69 K5 Z P8 J& |- c& F# A1 `
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 3.2
+ j( z' L. N' V6 CQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.7% e# [3 B" i6 @% [' L4 V8 O
College Readiness Index: 100.09 v0 S# m6 I H7 O/ d
{% f: e/ \" ~+ c
3. Whitney High School) E7 X" s9 U1 Q. A- _2 ?5 ?
: I! z; R0 E* c6 u% z6 XLocation: Cerritos, CA2 S7 S: F* d! z( j7 Y& D- s
Enrollment: 9840 t) K( @' F9 j4 G9 }
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 11.0* u, E; R; N! w- D' \6 U6 P4 x5 I
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 11.5( `7 C: h& Z4 A- X- i
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.1' N( [# y9 i% H3 u2 D' b
College Readiness Index: 100.0
( N3 L( d6 |$ w& g; M6 @! z% S) P9 o; i- _. Y+ s5 t4 o* S# w
4. Oxford Academy
& C0 w- f; _8 J9 S3 i/ ?. _; H- _# b1 _" a0 J( Q+ |! x
Location: Cypress, CA
& ~; g7 W8 g8 t g' TEnrollment: 1.021
' B' l- ^6 ] u$ s5 I$ [' S8 }( }2 ZEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 19.0
. ~" L- g" h+ R$ ?! ^) ?Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 12.7: d1 ^; i: P3 O* S/ w' P8 C: u6 q
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.0( w: @* S1 S2 A
College Readiness Index: 100.0
/ k) c* T* _4 {
& c- C k1 {3 o( }3 r5 T3 u5. School for the Talented and Gifted at Yvonne A. Ewell Townview Center2 K) x+ `! s7 c. @4 \; _9 ~
6 d3 z, b; i0 j) Q: f p; m
Location: Dallas, TX
8 L( [8 k# N+ ~Enrollment: 209% t: B' I5 l/ a G
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 24.9% u5 o: X& N1 V, f+ l6 @$ u& O R
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 51.2
9 m {1 h) Z1 I+ dQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 8.0. F& u5 q3 [6 S. o( T6 s5 H" A9 n
College Readiness Index: 100.0
4 }- |3 |* Q+ h
: r, D. l: B2 C+ q3 I3 U+ x6. Newcomers High School: j4 G$ l+ H& P: W! Z, Q/ O
8 {9 u, d4 }( q( \4 e( H
Location: Long Island City, NY; H `( W; y- K6 F
Enrollment: 1,016
+ W8 w) B5 [3 e n) i& \1 z* bEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 79.0 s; N& c6 q" k: _! k c7 p. g* a
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 60.70 P U5 M; k( T! ]7 S6 U
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 1.6
y3 j# R4 `! k* e* P" PCollege Readiness Index: 100.08 E+ z7 S' ]6 d4 o( a0 x8 ^
& i. u; a9 E* J1 d7 E$ p9 o7. Pacific Collegiate School
' y( g0 W. S3 H% ]! y( h; q9 e% c1 u R* m: B( l4 W9 a$ F3 d4 b
Location: Santa Cruz, CA( G2 m8 @$ Y0 E# x. {/ q
Enrollment: 383
" l4 @- Y0 m \4 H7 ^: ZEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.0
0 M1 [& F. A' k. n' xMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 8.4
: T9 T7 h+ p! c- `. M2 R& d& \Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.5
0 C) f- Y0 P5 @$ r @8 @8 X' KCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
" E* h; x( X+ N* v
+ Z2 v$ t) F# d& x8. School of Science and Engineering Magnet, O/ y" R1 M1 O7 G+ O
- `/ J4 F. t' wLocation: Dallas, TX
- j4 F, w' g! w# J7 l! U; ^# \Enrollment: 391& y! i, _3 }4 J9 D1 z
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 48.32 R2 \' g% ?" q3 B0 n
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 72.4
: A' u" c5 l6 aQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.1* H: @# \# e/ ?
College Readiness Index: 100.07 ^& j# ^, V- x$ |6 Z- }! m2 @
: A {# H# }# E3 M
9. BASIS Tucson
. I! S! M0 P7 I1 d% ?" T; i7 d$ V x: M6 q! t
Location: Tucson, AZ- b7 ~! [1 _' @+ Y, } q0 [
Enrollment: 5273 z, z; o( w) V M' `0 W! l
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.08 c# w1 ~1 v8 D* X _4 s% }
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 24.9$ n; c* w: f) ~1 C
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.7
6 ]6 B8 w, X9 T: A+ o1 r# Y1 I) tCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
) g: V) E" o# L6 [8 Z" H8 v: q' t U, `1 a# r
10. International School* N8 S$ a* V) L6 x' T
2 E6 O; d( O% D! C7 i" cLocation: Bellevue, WA
) U# z: b0 F! d) @- z# R% K2 d# KEnrollment: 509
/ i7 B1 \6 q* I5 w: lEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 3.6! S0 d7 [' O. C6 F( n1 i1 J# z
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 1.7
% G, b3 F4 E+ `6 E" P: o3 RQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 3.8# J4 M& {1 V8 T5 d% Y, D) K
College Readiness Index: 100.0 |
|
发表于 2011-10-22 06:26:18
